I am a junior web developer.
The array of the skills listed below encompass the breadth and depth understanding of working with web based projects /building a fully fledged application from start to finish,this includes but not limited to business logic,user-experience,and databases for storing the data of the projects
Python being a multi purpose general programming language,it allowed one to be versatile,so I have fundamental underatnding and sound knowledge of python web development frameworks,more specifically Django and Flask however my Personal
preference tends to be django. I have a fundamental grasp of Object Oriented prgramming principles,Object Relational Mappers,Data Structures and Alogorith Design and Analysis. I also have experience working with th python standard
library modules ,I also integrated Tkinter modules for system interface bulidng project.I also have bit of project awareness working with Data Science packgages/modules/libraries such Numpy,Pandas ,Scipy and Matplotlib for preprocessing
a and visualization of data
>DATABASES:STRUCTURED QUERY LANGUAGE,SQL,
The database I used for my projects include (1)Relational database,namely SQL database Server,the database management system(DBMS) library/APIs I mainly used for my projects are MySQLdb and PyMySQL
(2) NoSQL database,or Non-Relational database system,I also used is MongoDB server ,and the API used mainly was:pymongo
Skills I have learnt working with database system include among others,Data Definition language(DFL) ,which I used to create and manage the structure of the data in my Projects ,Data Manipulation Langugae(DML) ,these Querysets I used them primarily to manage the data itself. Data control language ,these are a set of queries,I used manly to control access to the data and data base system in my projects
Basics of navigating file systems,Directry Structure,FIles and Processs,FIle System security (access controll),etc
.
I have operarting knowledge of git source control framework which is utilized for the following changes made in codes during the development process. It allows different developer teams to work together on ventures, which enables us to finish the project on a stipulated timeframe
We thanks for all our awesome testimonials! There are hundreds of our happy customers!
Victor always ensure that he hand in client's project on time given the constrains ,he make sure that his work speaks on his behalf"
Explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you completed.
The master-builder of human happines no one rejects, dislikes avoids pleasure itself, because it is very pursue pleasure.
"Victor is a pleasure to work with and has a potential to contribute positively to the organisation through his communication prowess".
"Victor is one of the dedicated hardworking and innovative individual ,
He is the type of person you can count on to keep a cool head in a stressfull situation and his positive attitude is contagious.
He has wide array of skills which make him suitable for different varying types of projects."
.JPG)
"He is curteous arround customer and always acts professionally"
.JPG)
Victor always ensure that he hand in client's project on time given the constrains ,he make sure that his work speaks on his behalf"
Explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you completed.
The master-builder of human happines no one rejects, dislikes avoids pleasure itself, because it is very pursue pleasure.
"Victor is a pleasure to work with and has a potential to contribute positively to the organisation through his communication prowess".
"Victor is one of the dedicated hardworking and innovative individual ,
He is the type of person you can count on to keep a cool head in a stressfull situation and his positive attitude is contagious.
He has wide array of skills which make him suitable for different varying types of projects."
"He is curteous arround customer and always acts professionally"
.
. A principal reason for this view, Van Dijk said in an online call with journalists on Thursday, is that Naspers-controlled e-retailer Takealot.com “is doing a really, really good job” serving South African online consumers. Van Dijk would not be drawn on whether Naspers would entertain an offer for Takealot from Amazon – “we don’t speculate about future M&A; we never do that and won’t do that here, either” – but he said Amazon could be deterred from entering the local market because of Takealot’s relative strength. We look closely at the Net Promoter Score, which is really whether people like the service enough to recommend it to others In some respects, Takealot is channelling Amazon’s relentless focus on customer satisfaction. According to Van Dijk, the financial performance of Takealot is important, but so, too, is ensuring customers are satisfied with the platform. “We look closely at the Net Promoter Score, which is really whether people like the service enough to recommend it to others. There, Takealot has done just a fantastic job,” he said. “If they manage to continue to make customers happy at scale, like they have been doing, then I think there is limited room for Amazon to come in and offer something better.” Even if Amazon decides to enter South Africa’s e-commerce market directly, “this is not a winner-takes-all business”, Van Dijk said. “As long as you do your best for your customers and have scale, you have a good business.” — © 2021 NewsCentral Media
recently received a letter from my bank that was meant to explain something, but it didn’t. This reminded me of a fruitful conversation I had with someone on the Ministry of Testing slack community, about what motivations people might have for writing. In this post I’ll try to dig into that a bit, in case it’s helpful for the next time you need to write something technical. (I’m afraid I can’t help you with your next novel, or writing something to your sweetheart, valuable though those may be.) My experience of reading (and, I must confess, writing) technical documents has led me to believe that people often have one of three motivations behind what they write:.
When prospectors made what was the biggest oil discovery in history at Texas’s Spindletop well in 1901, the world’s premier oil monopolist was absent from the scene. Standard Oil, a decade away from being split up in an antitrust suit, was content to sit back and let smaller local rivals establish themselves. That’s a good analogy for the deals Google is striking with News Corp and Australian newspaper publishers, ahead of planned legislation there to enhance the news business’s bargaining power in negotiating with online platforms. Facebook is taking a more extreme approach, announcing on Thursday that it would quit distributing news from Australian publishers, and to Facebook news feeds in the country, altogether. John D Rockefeller didn’t much care who produced America’s oil, as long as he had a stranglehold on piping it, refining it and distributing it. Google is little different. By granting a boon to publishers, erstwhile rivals in the online advertising industry, it’s hoping to keep its hands on a far richer prize — scarcely challenged control and distribution of the world’s online information. Facebook, by refusing to compromise, is working toward the same end. Eventually, it took the supreme court to break John D Rockefeller’s empire. The digital platforms are hoping that they’ll be able to avoid a similar fate Still, the unconfirmed figures in the range of A$30-million mentioned in news reports are small beer compared to Australia’s roughly A$10-billion digital advertising market. Next to Google parent Alphabet and Facebook’s $183-billion and $86-billion in respective annual revenues, they barely register. The core of what the country’s antitrust regulator had sought from Google and Facebook was a levelling of the playing field. Google and Facebook are not just competitors with the news business in the market for digital advertising. They’re also crucial distributors who direct much of the traffic on which publishers’ ad revenues are based. ‘Monopoly gatekeeper’ That’s no different from other countries around the world, and indeed other industries beyond news. Google is, in the words of a US department of justice antitrust suit filed last October, “a monopoly gatekeeper for the Internet”. The European Union has levied some €8.3-billion of fines against the company since 2017 for anticompetitive practices. The real motherlode for these businesses is their ability to act as intermediaries for a digital advertising market that’s increasingly swallowing the world’s marketing budgets, hoovering up data on every side of the millisecond auctions that deliver eyeballs to online ads. That’s a black box that media buyers like Johnson & Johnson and L’Oreal, as well as media owners like News Corp and the New York Times Co, would love to get some insight into — and Australia’s proposed legislation offered a precedent for how it could happen. Under the rules, publishers would be allowed to negotiate as a group with digital platforms rather than individually, much as franchisees are allowed to locally in their dealings with global fast-food and convenience store chains. If the two sides are unable to come to an agreement on the revenue split, they’d have to submit blind final offers to an independent arbitration panel which would pick whichever looked more reasonable. The way to win those negotiations is to be open and honest about how much the business is worth to you. It’s striking that the threat of such a setup was so profound that Facebook has pulled out of news in Australia completely. Google, after threatening to do the same and shut off its local search engine for good measure, has opted to divide and conquer by striking deals with publishers one by one. In return for the small coin that an Australian news organisation would require to keep its head above water, those deals will hope to ensure that Google never has to get into a serious negotiation with an equally matched opponent, or establish a benchmark for what online content is worth. This might seem like a little local bother in a small, faraway country — but the willingness of the digital platforms to wheel out the big guns in defence of their position should be a clue to their ambitions and vulnerabilities worldwide. By sacrificing a chess piece in Texas, Standard Oil was able to hold onto its monopoly in the bit of the oil industry that really mattered for a decade. By giving up the fight over Australian news, Google and Facebook are able to focus their efforts on maintaining their monopolistic positions in the far larger markets for online information, and data about everyone who uses the web. Eventually, it took the supreme court to break John D Rockefeller’s empire. The digital platforms are hoping that they’ll be able to avoid a similar fate. — By David Fickling, (c) 2021 Bloomberg LP.
Have a question or want to call for interview.
Thanks you ,for finding interest in connecting with me professionally
